Nationwide,
Toll-Free:
866-694-0204 |
articles
in the |
|
series...
|
| |
Other
People's Money - by
Peter C. Beller, in Forbes Magazine, 04.23.07 |
| |
- - - - - - - |
| |
"Exchanger Beware..."
Intermediary's Commingled Account Destroys Clients'
1031 Exchanges -
by Gary Gorman, in The Colorado Real
Estate Journal, 02.18.04 |
| |
- - - - - - - |
| |
Another
1031 Intermediary Steals Client's Exchange
Money -
by Gary Gorman, in The Colorado Real Estate
Journal, 06.16.04 |
| |
- - - - - - - |
| |
Court
Puts Commingled 1031 Exchange Funds at
Risk -
by Gary Gorman, in The AZREIA Advantage,
09.04 |
| |
- - - - - - - |
| |
Yet
Another 1031 Intermediary Steals Client
Exchange Funds -
by Gary Gorman, in The Colorado
Real Estate Journal, 10.06.04 |
| |
- - - - - - - |
| |
A
Sad New Tale of 1031 Intermediary Theft -
by Gary Gorman, in The Colorado Real Estate
Journal, 04.05.06 |
| |
- - - - - - - |
|
|
 |
Yet Another 1031 Intermediary Steals Client Exchange Funds
For
the third
time this year we have a case where
an intermediary has stolen the funds from its client's
1031 exchanges. As in the prior instances of exchange
theft, the intermediary was able to commit this
fraud because the funds were held in a commingled
account.
 |
by
Gary Gorman
Founding Partner,
The 1031 Exchange Experts |
|
Intermediaries
can hold client exchange accounts in one of two
ways: in a commingled account, or in a segregated
account.
In a commingled account, the combined proceeds of
all of their clients' exchanges are held in one
single account. For example, if the intermediary
has 200 clients, all of their money would be pooled
into one account.
The alternative way is to hold the money in separate
accounts for each client. So in this instance, continuing
my example from above, the intermediary would have
200 separate accounts -- one for each client.
Recently, a Boston intermediary lost their funds
as a result of speculative securities trading. This
was made possible because the intermediary, Benistar
Property Exchange Trust Company, held clients
exchange funds in a commingled account.
This is remarkably similar to the Minnesota case
I reported on about six months ago. In the Minnesota
case the intermediary suffered massive day trading
losses. And just a couple of months ago I reported
on a California intermediary who took her clients'
exchange funds and disappeared.

|
|
 |
|
| |
| As
appeared in... |
|
 |
October
6 , 2004 |
|
|
|
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
The
common denominator in each of these cases was the ease
in which the intermediary could commit the fraud because
the money was held in a commingled account.
By
far, the scariest instance was the Minnesota case, because
it resulted in a court opinion that said that when an
intermediary commingles exchange funds, the commingled
account becomes an asset belonging to the intermediary,
not the clients!
In the Minnesota case the remaining balance in the commingled
account was used to pay other company creditors. In
addition, all of the exchange proceeds that had been
sent out to complete exchanges in the three months before
the intermediary went bankrupt had to be returned by
the former exchange clients, and used to pay other creditors.
The reason this is so scary is because we now
have a case that specifically states that a commingled
exchange account is an asset of the intermediary company
(the judge made it very clear that separate exchange
accounts belong to the individual exchange clients).
Here's
what alarms me about this: suppose an exchange client
sues their intermediary and wins a large judgment against
them. Because the Minnesota case says that the commingled
account is an asset of the intermediary, guess where
the client is going to go to collect on their judgment?
Exactly! From the commingled account. And what happens
to the other clients whose money goes to pay the judgment
merely because the intermediary held their money in
the commingled account? They sue, and the snowball of
lawsuits begins.
Take it one step further: let's say you sue your intermediary.
Because your intermediary holds its clients exchange
funds in a commingled account, you know that that will
be your source of collecting if you win your suit. But
to block your ability to collect if you win, all the
intermediary has to do is break their commingled account
into separate accounts for each client. What are you
going to do to keep them from diverting the funds? Right
-- when you file your suit you are going to attempt
to freeze the commingled account. Can you do this? I
don't know -- it probably depends on how good your attorney
is.
|
|
 |
| If
the account is frozen, what happens to the intermediary's
other clients whose money is trapped in the now frozen
account? If the freeze lasts beyond the contract date
for the purchase of their new property, they could default
on the purchase of their New Property. If it lasts beyond
their 180 days their exchange is toast since there are
no extensions of the 180 day deadline.
...this
is scary because we now have a case that
says a commingled account is an asset of
the intermediary... |
|
Really
scary stuff isn't it? The solution, again, is to make
sure that your exchange funds are held in a separate
exchange account: just your funds in one account and
no one else's. And a separate account must be separate
not only from other client's monies, but also separate
from the intermediary's assets.
My
company, for example, holds the funds from every
client's exchange in its own separate account because
it's obviously the only way to protect our client's
funds. Each of our accounts has the clients name on
it (i.e., “The 1031 Exchange Experts, as intermediary
for Fred and Sue Jones”), AND
the client's tax identification number or social security
number is also on the account. If something bad happens
to us, the Qualified Intermediary, then our client's
exchange funds are still intact and accessible.
Another way we give our clients assurance that their
money goes into their own account (and stays there)
is with a service we call 1031Access
(sm),
which assigns a secure portal through our web site to
each client for their exchange. By using their assigned
username, this 'secret' portal allows them to view their
money in their account at the bank, 24/7, via a secure
Internet connection. Their portal is protected with
a password they set themselves. In this way, using their
secret portal, clients can see what moneys have come
into their account, what's gone out, how much interest
the account has earned and what their current interest
rate is.
Like the judge in the Minnesota fraud case said, if
your exchange money is in a commingled account, “Caveat
Exchanger” (or, “Exchanger Beware!”).
|
|
|